Philosophy

Philosophies of Science Are Interpretations of Science

 

Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, Creation by Chance, Causation by Chance, and even the Theory of Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics ARE philosophies of science.  They are different ways that science gets interpreted.

Technically, these things are not Science or Knowledge – they are philosophies of science or different interpretations of science.  In fact, Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, and their derivatives are faulty and falsified interpretations of science.  They have been FALSIFIED by Science, the Scientific Methods, Science Experiments, as well as the Observations and the Lived Experiences of the human race as a whole.

For example, everything that exists falsifies the second law of thermodynamics which says that it shouldn’t exist.  The very fact that you exist and are reading this right now is scientific proof that the second law of thermodynamics is false.  The second law of thermodynamics states that the total amount of entropy or disorder in our universe is constantly increasing and that it can never decrease and go to zero.  This is NOT what we experience and observe!  Instead, we observe constantly conserved Order and Organization all throughout our universe.  We don’t observe any of the things that the second law predicts, which is why it is false.

Both the Theory of Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics ARE Creation by Chance, Creation by Random Disorder, or Chance Causality.  Given the proven and verified fact that chance cannot design and create anything, and that it has NEVER been observed doing so, this reality serves as scientific proof that the Theory of Evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics as well as Materialism, Naturalism, and Atheism ARE false because these things are in fact Creation by Chance or the Null Hypothesis and were produced or “caused” by chance alone.

Once we accept the fact that CHANCE cannot design and create anything, then we automatically KNOW that Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, the Theory of Evolution, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and every other form of Creation by Chance or Chance Causality is FALSE because creation by chance, chance causality, spontaneous generation, abiogenesis, or creation ex nihilo has NEVER been experienced NOR observed.  The false is falsified by the truth, and the truth is repeatedly experienced and observed.  If something has never been experienced nor observed, then we KNOW that it is in fact false and that it doesn’t exist.

Most of my books are about the Philosophy of Science.  I’ve been trying to find a better, more realistic, and more parsimonious Philosophy of Science that is actually true and that actually matches with the observations and lived experiences of the human race.  Such a thing doesn’t exist, so I had to make one which I called Science 2.0.  I even have a book on the subject which I use to introduce the Philosophy of Science to the world.

I have a half a dozen different books on the Philosophy of Science or the interpretation of science, in which I falsify the faulty and false philosophies of science and then try to develop a better Philosophy of Science or Interpretation of Science that actually matches with Reality, which consists of the Observations and the Lived Experiences of the human race as a whole.

You see, we will NEVER know the truth as long as we keep using faulty and falsified “philosophies of science” to interpret our scientific evidence and scientific data.  A faulty, falsified, or false interpretation of the data or evidence doesn’t magically provide us with a True Science or a True Philosophy of Science.  Lies produce additional lies, which is why I have gone in search of Truth in Science; and, that often starts by getting a Philosophy of Science that is actually true and that has been experienced and observed.

Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism make the CLAIM that the non-physical does not exist.  In other words, these falsified religions or falsified philosophies make the claim that the non-physical, massless, chargeless, and entropyless quantum waves or photons DO NOT EXIST.  Darwinism and Naturalism also make the erroneous claim that space and time do not exist.  Space and time are obviously massless or non-physical; and, Naturalism or Atheism of any kind makes the claim that the non-physical DOES NOT EXIST.  The Quantum Fields are obviously massless, heatless, and entropyless non-physical perpetual motion machines.  Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism make the claim that the non-physical Quantum Fields DO NOT EXIST.

We don’t observe the non-existence of these things!

In fact, we don’t observe anything that Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, or Atheism predicts.  We don’t observe anything that the Second Law of Thermodynamics predicts either, except for the inability of physical matter to function as a massless and entropyless perpetual motion machine, quantum wave, photon, or quantum field.  Likewise, we don’t observe anything that the Theory of Evolution predicts, except for the extinction of species.  The Theory of Evolution predicts spontaneous generation, abiogenesis, chemical evolution, protein synthesis by chance alone, creation by death or natural selection, creation by chance or random disorder, and macro-evolution.  We don’t observe any of these things, which means that the Theory of Evolution is false.

Faulty and falsified philosophies of science will NEVER provide us with a True Interpretation of our scientific data or scientific evidence.  If something hasn’t been experienced nor observed, then it isn’t real, and it doesn’t exist.  A phenomenon has to be experienced and observed in order for it to be real and true.  That’s just the way it is.  This is logical common sense; and, it falsifies the false philosophies of science or the false interpretations of science, because they have never been experienced nor observed.

I’ve been searching for a Philosophy of Science that is true for five years now.  I’m getting a bit closer to finding what I am searching for, as I become more aware of what’s involved in my quest.

Mark My Words


Philosophy of Science

I had to develop a new and better way of looking at the world and reality, because the one that I had gotten from my society wasn’t working for me.  It was working against me.

Continue Reading

 


The Appearance of Design

Biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose. – Richard Dawkins.

They have the appearance of having been designed because they were designed.  There’s NO other logical explanation for their origin, because entropy or physical matter cannot design and create anything.

Continue Reading

Proof of God Listing

Proof of God by Process of Elimination

A couple of years ago, I developed a Scientific Proof of God that I found extremely convincing.  It was the thing that convinced me that God, of necessity, must exist.  It was a Proof of God through a Process of Elimination.

Continue Reading

 


My Philosophical Proof of God

An argument is valid if the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.  An argument is sound if it is valid and the premises are true.

I have developed a philosophical proof of God’s existence – or two – that I find logically compelling, philosophically valid, and scientifically sound.  Let’s start with the best and most believable philosophical proof of God’s existence, the Kalam Cosmological Argument.

Continue Reading

Logic Fallacies

Philosophical Assumptions and Logic Fallacies

The thing I do love to study about philosophy is ALL of the different logic fallacies, falsified premises, and hidden assumptions that the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists use to trick us and deceive us.  Clearly, these people are able to trick us and deceive us, and I always wanted to know how they do it; and, now I know.

Continue Reading

 


Verification vs. Falsification

Obviously, I am not the first person on the planet to determine the difference between affirming the consequent and negating the consequent.  However, as far as I can tell, I am the first person to apply both of them directly to Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and Atheism and then observe how things turn out when I do.

Continue Reading

Blog

Using the Scientific Method to Find the Truth

Using the Scientific Method to Eliminate the Usual Suspects and to Prove the Truth   https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01J6STHP0/ The original title of this book was, “Using the Scientific Method: To Eliminate the Usual Suspects and to Prove the Truth”. The original idea was to get at the truth and to “prove the truth” by falsifying and eliminating …

I’m Not a Creationist

I’m Not a Creationist   I’m not a Creationist. What does this mean in practice? It means that I don’t believe in creation ex nihilo, which the Christian Catholics and Protestants choose to believe in and promote. Creation ex nihilo is impossible and patently absurd. I’m not a Creationist – I don’t believe in creation …

Contact

The best way to “contact us” is through the books that I have written.  Go ahead, make my day, send some love along my way.

My Amazon Author Page:

https://amazon.com/author/science

Click the link.  You know you want to.


The book upon which most of this was originally based:



The book containing most of these articles: